But with certain Apps/scenarios, 16 GB yields a much smoother operating experience, and some tasks 8 will be woefully inadequate for. 8GB can do quite a bit, and the fast NVMe SSDs can somewhat offset the performance tolls incurred when the system caches to the SSD. with macOS 10.16 High High High High Sierra. Things change with a second user, and will likely change by say 2020. However, there is that 5% of the time where more than 8 GB would be helpful. In my personal case 95% of the time 8 GB is sufficient in a MacBook, particularly because I do most of my heavy lifting on an iMac. I got 16 GB in my MacBook non-Pro, and it was with an m3, not the i5 or i7. I do think it says something though that it is now impossible to get a Mac laptop with less than 8 GB RAM. if you don't keep your laptops a long time, but if you're unsure, it may be prudent to get more. There's nothing wrong with getting 8 GB if you know that's all you need, esp. Note though I bought the machine with 2 GB, thinking that 4 GB is all that I'd ever need in the machine. With 4 GB it's still decent for basic use, but even for basic use it's not as good as 8 GB. I still am using my 2009 MacBook Pro because I could put 8 GB RAM in it, so as a secondary machine it's quite decent. I'd much rather err on the side of too much memory, even at the expense of faster CPU speed. If you buy too much, no big deal as it's just a couple of hundred bucks. If you buy too little then it is a shame because you can't upgrade later without getting a new machine. However, these days you have just one chance to properly configure the machine. from Apple, would be horrendously expensive, while buying RAM a couple of years later would save money. In fact, it often made sense to do so, because buying memory at launch, esp. In the past it wasn't such a big deal, because you could simply just upgrade the memory later. It does not tell us what would be fine 3 years later. It does not truly factor occasional changes in workflow, and it doesn't factor increased memory usage by software and the OS over time. Well, it turns out it's mostly true, but ultimately it's still a canned test, and furthermore it's for that time period. Back in the day, you'd see the exact same tests telling you 2 GB is fine. Click to expand.These types of tests never provide the full picture.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |